Jessica’s sermon to @JuanitaBerguson – self-proclaimed ‘preacher’. 1st April  ‘14

I have done a minimum of editing, to remove repeated words and iphone autocorrect solecisms:

I read your “sermon” and didn’t interrupt. I’ll respond now, though I doubt you (will) read it. But here goes:

As an atheist I reject your pompous claim to know the mind of god. You (clearly) have no understanding of the history of your own book or the tenuous background and historical context in which it was written. If, in fact, you understood your own tome, you would recognize that (as) a woman you shouldn’t be literate, much less have a pulpit from which to preach like a social media forum, which is what Twitter is. You would know your place, not as the mouthpiece of the divine, but as the chattel of your patriarchal masters.

The punishment you pedal is the vain imagining of a deluded and cruel sect that imposed their will by fear, and every single Abrahamic religion spouts it. You have accepted this book because it was the one you had to hand. You preach hell to others in the sad attempt to force your personal agenda down the throats of others, because fear likes a warm bed partner.

Do you really think that humans who imagined and (brought) to fruition things like the wheel, medicine, sanitation, the space program and “where the wild things are” (are) incapable of imagining something so simple as a concept of god? In the pre-iron age, humans needed explanations for natural events. We’ve grown and learned better now. You should know that your religion has been used as an effective tool to keep the masses in line for centuries. But, humans are growing up. We can see that slavery is wrong, without the Bible*. We don’t need to burn doctors and scientists at the stake for heresy.

Your god is one of many & will fall out of favor, as they all have & must, but your need to feel important, to feel as though you are a Messenger is your own vain ambition. For those of us who show through our actions that morality is not kowtowing to an imaginary beast but that equality, justice, goodness and doing what is good and right is not predicated by a book of fables should give you real hope because the life we have is now. We are alive and able to care for one another NOW.

Prophesying doom and destruction is the stronghold of the bitter and jealous. Don’t pretend that threats are love, and unless you are prepared to define the entirety of ‘Romans’, don’t throw up 10:9 &10** as your shield. Your book is barbaric. Your hell is a tormented fiction, and humanity can do better.

In the end what we have is each other. We are people together, on a tiny spinning planet, and what endures and builds the future is the love and compassion we bear for one another. That’s tangible and real. Reality is hard, I know, but every person is human. Every person is unique. Every single person is deserving of a chance to live free from fear.

*Which, incidentally, condones slavery. Ed

** “That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.”  Ed.

Some thoughts on truth inspired by the ludicrous claims of religious believers who claim their particular source book as THE TRUTH:

Truth is a strange world. One person’s truth is another’s illusion. Take religion: for a true believer THE book – bible, koran, torah, dhammapada, etc., etc. – is the Truth, literally. To the non-believer it is just so much arrant nonsense.

It raises the question: is there an objective truth to which we can all subscribe? In reading @Jen_August over many months I am struck by the fact that many of her atheistic insights and truths coincide and chime with the avowedly deistic revelations of Sherri Bessi, author of ‘The Other Side of Ugly’ as well as the insights of non-dualistic philosophy, such as the ‘Truthless Truth’ blog or the writings of Eckhart Tolle.

So what are they these coincidences? It is worth listing them:

1 Truth exists only in the here and the now. The past and future are illusory.

2 Truth is limitless, like human potential. It cannot be contained.

3 Truth is conscious; it is wakeful and ever present.

4 Truth is well informed – there has to be a genuine desire to ‘know’ reinforced by repeatable non-anecdotal experience.

5 There is a truly universal aspect to individuality. Humanity is an aspect of that unity.

6 Truth just is. (Justice?) Reality has nothing to do with individual preference.

7 Truth has no definitive answers, only endless questions to maintain openness of mind and heart.

8 Doubt, difficulties and impediments are necessary points of potential growth. They are one’s true teacher.

9 Truth IS reality. Thoughts are essential but also a limit. Mindfulness is ever necessary.

10 Truth is desireless; whatever is presented in life is a necessary stimulus for action.

11 Truth is attention; it is the ‘listening post of the Universe’.

12 Truth is still and unmoving because it has nowhere to go.

13 Truth is silent because it does nothing at all but is the witness of all

14. Truth is peaceful because it is ever at rest. It is truly one’s self.

15 Truth is unknowable objectively, but is known in experience. It has a distinct ‘taste’.

16 Truth is ever the ‘same’ and infinitely flexible, it bears all without objection or complaint. 

Stephen Coulson

@philositect on Twitter

Some thoughts on the state of UK’s politics in the light of the rise of UKIP as tweeted to @16bitheretic

UKIP’s stellar performance in the May 2014 council & EU elections is founded on populist & opportunistic support for UK’s withdrawal from the EU. Fifteen years ago concern grew about the cost of membership of the EU & the associated loss of sovereignty to the EU, especially the un-British decisions of the Courts at the Hague seemed alien to many.

In particular the EU’s stated aim of ‘ever closer political union’, suggesting the threat of the United States of Europe, proved unacceptable to the UK’s fierce independence. The UK pointedly refused to join the introduction of the Euro.

Withdrawal from the EU gained popularity particularly among the right wing of the Conservative (Tory) Party, redolent of the ‘Little Englanders’ of the late 1930s – isolation from the demonstrable & actual threat of Nazism. But Tory dithering – because there are benefits to the costly EU membership – nourished defiant anti-EU feeling & UKIP was born.

The 2008 ‘credit crunch’ and the ‘bearish’ economy ushered in nearly 10% unemployment – especially youth unemployment rose steeply – thus targeting the EU’s ‘open door’ immigration policy. Mass eastern European immigration, mainly from Poland, became the scapegoat for this rampant unemployment. Polish is said to be UK’s second language now, such was the flood. Being good workers the Poles thrived, being happy to do the work the indigenous population won’t do & working for ‘affordable’ wages.

Then the potential EU membership of ‘backward’ Romania & Bulgaria threatened ever more unlimited eastern European immigration. The (Labour) government put a temporary lid on immigration from Romania & Bulgaria but only to January 2014 because of detested EU regulations.

UKIP relished these immigration fears, beloved of the right-wing ‘red-top’ (populist) press, & their second main plank was born: immigration became no longer the taboo subject of political debate and fear of east European mass immigration stoked UKIP’s support. There is also a hated Moslem component in the Slavic populace.

Populist thought is irredeemably racist. Even the Metropolitan Police was accused of ‘Institutional Racism’.
As with the Russian Mafia, there is also a fear of east European criminality which reinforced UKIP’s anti-immigration stance, so, this is UKIP policy in a nutshell:
1 Pro-immediate withdrawal from the EU
2 Anti-immigration – ALL immigration – but especially the EU’s ‘open door’ policy
3 Fear of rise in ruthless east European Mafia-style criminality.

Nigel Farage, UKIP’s leader, cleverly distanced himself from the detested political establishment as a ‘man of the people’. Beer supping & accepting racist, sexist & homophobic candidates to the UKIP fold the scene was set for last weeks’ elections. The fact that UKIP had to expel a number of their members for unacceptable statements in the press seemed to have had zero effect upon its popularity. Indeed, just the opposite, it made the ‘party’ even more attractive to the latent racism, sexism & homophobia of the populace.

The Liberal-Democrat coalition with the Tories has decimated their support as they are now seen as part of the hated establishment and lackeys to the ‘nasty’ Tory party. Their back-tracking on student fees may never be forgiven, it will certainly not be forgotten.

Thoughtful centrist politics has crumbled under the onslaught of ignorant opportunist populist politics. Intellectualism or balanced thinking is the loser in the political stakes. Oddly, traditional Labour (left-wing) support – being itself essentially populist & non-intellectual – has rushed to support UKIP too.

Thus UKIP’s populism has damaged all sectors of the political establishment taking support from both right & left. However, UKIP’s populism neglects to observe that east European immigration has benefitted and boosted the UK’s overall economy. Immigrants are prepared to do the work shunned by the indigenous population. The ‘care’ industry, for example, would collapse without them.

The indigenous population had grown relatively fat on welfare payments, which had reached unsustainable levels under the psychologically questionable leadership of the egregious Gordon Brown, leading to necessary & essential ‘Tory cuts’ in order to bring some rectitude to the government’s finances.

The government cutbacks – Tory/Lib Dem – are deeply & understandably unpopular, thus feeding the idea of the Tories as the ‘nasty’ party, with its Cabinet of ‘millionaires’ which distances it from the ‘common man’.
The Labour Party leader – Ed Milliband – is seen as deeply flawed and ineffectual hence all three main parties are UKIP-vulnerable.

There you have it: UKIP’s meteoric rise based on detestation of the three main parties & with anti-intellectual, scapegoat, populist & opportunistic policies agitated by the right-wing populist press.
The scene is being set for 2015’s general election. UKIP can’t win but it can certainly throw a spanner into the establishment works.

Labour probably can’t win either because of its deeply flawed leadership – the ‘back-stabbing’ Ed Milliband (of his much admired brother David) & the egregious and oleaginous Ed Balls. The Labour Party is also tarred being the government at the time of the ‘credit crunch’ with its attendant virtual bankruptcy of the country’s fiscal standing.

The Liberal Democrats have been terminally scarred by association with the ‘nasty’ Tories and broken promises. It may take a generation to recoup; it may never recoup.

The Tories have a chance of further electoral success if they excise their right-wing & move firmly towards the centre. The Tory right wing is natural UKIP fodder.

All this is of course dependent upon September’s vote on Scottish independence. The ‘yes’ vote is gaining inexorably upon the ‘no’ camp. If ‘yes’ wins it will consign the Labour Party to the UK political wilderness as it traditionally relies on Scottish MPs to gain a majority at Westminster. If the ‘noes’ win then the outcome of the general election is less clear as Labour will have a chance to dislodge the Tories by their Scottish representation. The Tories are all but defunct in Scotland.

So there we have it – some thoughts on UKIP & the UK’s current political scene generally. I hope it makes some sort of sense.

The above is a barely edited version of the original series of tweets and as such may stand alone as a brief overview. It was intended to be read by a young American woman whose tweets are interesting and enjoyable and who knew little of the UK political scene. She was completely unaware of the Scottish independence plebiscite.

Stephen Coulson
@philositect on twitter

No matter how daunting the obstacles & some are great indeed, there comes a time when the individual has to take charge of their existence. Victim mentalities are entirely understandable, but ultimately they inhibit personal healing & development. Hanging on in quiet desperation.

At some point or another we discover that we sentence ourselves by the thoughts & beliefs we hold on to. No other person is involved. At the level of individuality I am what I think. Or believe. Individuality is an entity created by family, school, peer group & inclination.

Individuality equals ego. In the search for personal freedom a damaged ego needs bolstering. Damaged egos need careful nurturing. But when one is ‘happy in one’s skin’ the next step of personal liberation presents itself. It is to address the question of one’s identity.

To question one’s own identity gives rise to the ultimate question of philosophy: ‘Who am I?’ or, more accurately: ‘What am I?’ This question, if asked sincerely, is the first step to personal liberation. Plato essays this process in his ‘Allegory of the Cave’.

In practice the first step is to begin to observe that one’s own thoughts come and go. Mind is innately friable, it vacillates. It passes. We all have known an occasional change of mind & sometimes we have also experienced a change of heart. Thought, belief is not permanent.

There are deeply-held beliefs that appear to be permanent, but under examination what is really shown is the personal degree of attachment. We are closely attached to those ideas, concepts, opinions & beliefs upon which we build our individual identity. But they’re all chimeras. Our politics, our religious affiliation or non-affiliation (atheism) are all aspects of our identities which we might die defending. Crazy.

Once having realised the unreliability of undisciplined mind and heart the next step is to bring a gentle discipline to our use of them. This step requires decision, intent, endeavour and practice; it IS practical philosophy. It needs stillness & silence (pace Eckhart Tolle).

To be clear, I am not speaking of personality here. An introvert will almost certainly become a liberated introvert. Ditto extrovert. An austere person will become austerely free and a hedonist will retain a zest for life even after self-realisation & personal freedom. Personality is fine, it adds entertainment to existence. ‘Identity’ is the issue. Are we to remain small, or identify with the large?

This was Nelson Mandela’s point when quoting Marianne Williamson, who puts it in a Christian context, but the religion is not essential:

Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frightens us. We ask ourselves, Who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous, talented, fabulous? Actually, who are you not to be? You are a child of God. Your playing small does not serve the world. There is nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won’t feel insecure around you. We are all meant to shine, as children do. We were born to make manifest the glory of God that is within us. It’s not just in some of us; it’s in everyone. And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others.”

In the practice of observing the movements of the mind it may be realised that self, unlimited consciousness or awareness, is ever present. Self has no other true identity other than its self. It is neither male nor female, good nor bad, short nor tall, fat nor thin. These opposites are all dualities. The self is one, it is truly non-dual. It is singular & alone (all-one). And it is universal & limitless.

It is only by being true to oneself (Hamlet: Polonius/Laertes) & by knowing oneself (The Delphic Oracle) that personal freedom is achieved. And, what is freedom / liberation? It is freedom from the tyranny of the mind, from random, limited, iterative, circling thought. Freedom is transcendent. It transcends the self-imposed mental & emotional limits. It opens the heart & mind to a larger infinite existence.

Once free of the mental & emotional tyranny ‘I’ become master or mistress of the mind & emotional landscape. All become part of the play. Mind then becomes what it is in potential: a great mental and emotional instrument. Reason & freedom become the mark of one’s existence.

Just as one wouldn’t identify with a vacuum cleaner or toaster (except for comic effect) so identity with the mind departs & peace is found.

In freedom one remains true to oneself, honest and happily at peace. This, I would contend, is the greatest gift you can give to the world.


This ‘rant’ or thesis was originally tweeted within the discipline of the 140 character maximum on 26th January and has been barely edited for replication on the blog. In so doing I believe the terseness of the original is beneficially preserved. There is much here warranting a more fully developed blog post and it maybe that I will review the subject more fully later. In the meantime I hope you enjoy the message contained herein.

Stephen Coulson

@philositect on Twitter


Politics – or more accurately bloody politics: I was thinking about left, right, the democratic centre & associated Twitter bad-mouthing. I find the bad-mouthing of variant views on Twitter tiresome, such as the irreligious volleys and trolling from theists to atheists (especially the crazy Islamic apoplexy).

Extreme political views are very like fundamentalist religious viewpoints: intransigent, blindly inward looking & smugly self-satisfied.

It struck me that at the far extremity of both the political right & left lies intolerance & the ineluctable tendency to tyrannical thought. It is as if the intolerant extreme right meets with & holds the hand of the tyrannical extreme left closing the circle of political thought.

So today it’s not so much a political question of left & right but of front & back, for behind the face of democracy lies concealed tyranny. Political extremism has answers – pat, hard, inflexible, unchanging, predictable answers. Like fundamental religion it has ALL the answers.

Centrism on the other hand is at the point of balance; either left or right leaning it is marked by rationality & even-handedness. At the centre there are genuine questions searching for political answers appropriate to time and place. Occasionally the centre may look wishy-washy and undirected, but at least it’s essentially clean & open to guidance.

Do we wish to be governed by ‘know-all’ extremism (e.g. sharia) or by reasoned and balanced centrists seeking freedom & prosperity for all?

Churchill wryly observed that democracy is the worst form of government except for all the others that have been tried from time to time. The problem with democracy is the 4/5 year electoral cycle which forces political thought to be essentially short-term in nature.

Today we are witnessing Russia retrenching to tyranny, passing Myanmar on the way moving back from dictatorship to a degree of freedom.

Anthony de Mello observes that men kill for money & power but the most vicious murderers are those who kill for ideas & beliefs. Tyranny can never last because the spirit of humanity has an unquenchable thirst for liberty. Tyranny then contains its own destruction. Tyrannical government of a country is ever associated with inflexible fundamental belief, albeit theocratic, communistic or fascistic.

Humanity deserves better.

Remember Edmund Burke’s warning ‘All it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing’. Freedom always has to be vigilant. The vicious forces of tyranny are ever seeking to supplant the gentler hand of democracy. If we value vigilance then we must wake up to value a broad liberal education & thereby seek the best for our children & grand-children.

In particular insidious religious belief contained in such ‘subjects’ as ‘creationism’ must be kept away from the classroom and left in the Sunday school where they belong.


The above viewpoint was tweeted on 25th January 2014 in tweets within the 140 character limit. I have slightly edited it for publication as a blog post, but decided not to develop the thesis contained therein in order to preserve the essential freshness and tightness needed for Twitter. I may write a more rounded and fully argued post in the future.


It all started with a visit to a barber-shop. I asked the barber if he knew what the persistent ‘scab’ was on my scalp and he suggested a visit to the doctor. Surprisingly, I went. The doc said it was a wart of some kind and proceeded to freeze it with a directional spray gismo. ‘It’ll drop off in a day or so.’ It took a week.

In the meantime he saw that my annual ‘bloods’ were well-overdue and he gave me a chit to arrange a blood test. I have annual liver-function tests following the prescription of statins some years previously. The receptionist at the surgery said that there was a month’s wait for these tests which meant, by their own in-house rules, that I couldn’t be booked in so I determined to go to the local hospital for the tests. Surprisingly, I went.

The blood test requires ‘fasting lipids’ and a few days later I hungrily joined the packed waiting room at Watford General Hospital, took my ticket from the queuing machine and sat down to tackle the ‘Mind Games’ pages of Times 2 – su doku, killer su doku, kakuro, codeword, Times 2 crossword, etc. – and only two hours later I was conducted into a screened cubby-hole where a stout female technician in a dog-eared off-white overall proceeded to try and abstract the required number of phials. As usual she had difficulty – they always have difficulty in running down a compliant vein, go figure – but eventually at around 11am on this Friday morning the test was completed: the four phials full and labelled and I could belatedly go for my morning coffee. Only coffee addicts will understand the importance of this freedom.

At 9am the following Monday my GP (General Practitioner – family medic) rang me at home. I was immediately alerted to bad news: doctors never ring patients, do they? And certainly not at 9am on a Monday morning! And the speed: I had only given the blood seventy hours earlier and the weekend had intervened! When did they do the tests? ‘I want to see you’ was all he said and it was arranged that I would pop-in on Thursday morning. I turned up at the due time and was almost immediately shown in to see the doc. Again, the speed! Almost unheard of, I always have to wait an apparently obligatory ten to twenty minutes or so but not this day.

‘Your PSA is a bit high’ he told me. I knew not what PSA meant and he informed me it was an indicator of problems with the prostate. As a sixty-something male I was not in the least bit surprised to hear this, I thought pretty much all men of my age have prostate problems (I was wrong, it turns out to be about 1 in 6 men). My GP is a man of few words but he said enough for me to ask ‘So, what you’re saying is I have prostate cancer?’ ‘Oh, yes.’ came his casual bombshell of an answer.

PSA stands for Prostate-Specific Antigen and it is a less than accurate test but a good indicator of possible problems. Healthy prostates have negligible PSA-count – less than 1 – my tests had shown a reading of 33. So it was finger up the bum time. Afterwards, stripping the medical gloves from his hands, my GP said the prostate seemed ok, but was a bit ‘gravelly’ as if I might actually appreciate what this assessment meant. He decided to send me for a biopsy. This was arranged for two weeks hence at the urology department of St Albans City Hospital.

At this point I should point out for non-UK residents that all of this comes under the auspices of the NHS – National Health Service – which has become something of a political football over recent years, with multiple reorganisations in attempts to find ever-greater but illusive efficiencies. The invention of the immediate post-war Labour Government, the NHS is THE sacred-cow of UK politics, with the socialists claiming ‘ownership’ and continually employing scare-tactics to suggest that it is not ‘safe’ under any other political administration. But so far so good; the economics of the NHS are fraught with difficulties and changes are bound to happen in the future. The important point to bear in mind here, though, is that the NHS is free at the point of delivery.
It was a very warm spring day that I parked up in the St Albans City Hospital car park and was handed a part used ticket by a kindly departing driver. I was not kept waiting for long and was shown into the doctor’s consulting room where, without further ado, he took two biopsies and having made a follow-up appointment for two weeks hence I was to able depart and allowed to drive home. Strangely, he asked me why my GP had had the PSA count done; I didn’t know, but was tempted to say ‘Duh?’

Now there is an unexpected oddity here and I can only guess at the reason, but at no time during those few weeks or since did I experience any worry or concern. Maybe I have an overriding faith in medical science? Maybe it is because of my ignorance of the byways of prostate cancer? Or the fact that I feel well and have never felt ill? Possibly it can be laid at the door of 30 years of on/off practice of mantra meditation or the association with a school of non-duality (Advaita) but whatever the cause is I remain free of worry or concern about the illness. This could of course all change if the disease becomes terminal, but I have had a decent life and have tried to live honestly and as I have no belief in a life hereafter maybe I am just inured to the idea of departing this existence.

Another warm and sunny spring day welcomed the follow-up consultation in St Albans and the urologist informed me that one of the biopsies had proven ‘clean’ but the other showed the presence of cancerous cells. So it was definite: the Big C was confirmed! The next step was to attend at Watford General Hospital for two scans: one required attendance at the ‘nuclear’ department where I was to be given an isotope laden injection to check out the lymph nodes and the other was to be a bone scan. Apparently, if metastasization has taken place the first call of roaming prostate cancer cells is to the lymph nodes or the bone marrow.

A week later I turned up at the hospital early expecting the usual queues but the Nuclear Department was deserted except for a sign inviting a knock on a closed door, like Alice in Wonderland. A possibly Filipina lady answered my knock; she ushered me inside, gave me the injection and arranged for me to return in four hours for the scan. In the meantime she phoned the bone scan people and amazingly they had an opening for me there and then so I was wheeled round the corner (not literally – I walked) into a smart suite of rooms where I changed into a hospital paper gown and was half-nakedly perched on a chair in the corridor. After a short wait I was shown into a large room with impressive space-filling apparatus; the bone scan was done quickly and I was let go. I had a few hours to fill which I spent with the Times and two languid cappuccino coffees in the hospital’s smart airy restaurant.

The nuclear department was just as deserted upon my return at 2pm as it had been first thing and the middle-aged lady technician dealt with the lymph-node scan without further ado and that was it. My next appointment was in two weeks’ time with the oncologist at his clinic at Hemel Hempstead General Hospital (if nothing else I was getting a pretty comprehensive overview of the local Hertfordshire hospital scene).
Mrs C decided she was going to tag along to this first consultation with the oncologist. The time had come to get real. Once again the consultation suite was well-staffed, clean, bright and airy and once again it was almost deserted when we wheeled in (this time literally – Mrs C uses a wheelchair). So we didn’t have to wait long before I was called in. (Call me stupid, but it never dawned on me to take Maureen into the consulting room – she was really quite miffed when I eventually emerged, but we were then joined by my assigned Macmillan nurse who explained everything to my wife so she was mollified to a degree and I needed to hear everything again anyway – so much to ‘take in’). Macmillan nurses are part of a nation-wide charitable cancer care operation.

The clinic was a joint operation by the urologist and the oncologist and the two doctors were joined by ‘my’ MacMillan nurse. They were refreshingly direct: the two recent scan results seemed ok, but the bone scan showed a ‘hot-spot’ on my upper right arm which they wanted an x-ray of to rule out cancer of the bone, and this was fitted-in before we left the hospital. They ruled out surgery (C too advanced) and chemotherapy (no metastasization) and recommended a three-year course of hormone replacement therapy combined with 37 daily radiotherapy sessions planned to take place three months after the commencement of the hormone therapy – which was to begin within a week. It all seemed straightforward and nothing ‘to get hung about’.

The oncologist was running a research study for which I was, apparently, ideally suited and an appointment for the following week was arranged at the Madame Curie Research Wing at Mount Vernon Hospital in Northwood. In addition to the hormone replacement and radiotherapy the study involved the taking of vitamin B3 and the use of ‘carbogen’, an oxygen rich breathing mixture, during radiography treatment and the four MRI sessions that the research required. The additional x-rays taken at Hemel Hempstead Hospital had proven to be ‘wear and tear’ and nothing to do with the cancer, so the stage was set.

I was sent that day to have a CT scan (Computer tomography) to accurately locate the cancer and thereafter I called in at the hospital’s pharmacy to collect the first two weeks’ hormone replacement tablets. After two weeks I was to visit my GP to have the first of the twelve three-monthly subcutaneous hormone replacement injections. After three months of this treatment the 37 radiotherapy sessions could begin on 13th August 2013.
I was told that certain effects from the radiotherapy were to be expected: these would include the ease and ability of passing urine and solids and a growing exhaustion or fatigue. In the meantime life could go on and we arranged a short holiday with family and friends in Dorset and Devon with a return home planned to coincide with the MRI scan and first radiotherapy session on the 13th.

The MRI scans proved to be marathons. All scans took 90 minutes each, the middle 30 of which were accompanied by the breathing of the oxygen-rich carbogen mixture and the whole 90 minutes proved to be a symphony of mechanical sounds covering the audible spectrum, protection from which was provided by headphones through which music of choice – Mozart for the first MRI – was relayed.

Upon leaving the MRI suite I had to take 12 vitamin B3 tablets prior to the first radiography session an hour later. I’ve never had any trouble taking pills or tablets so I casually washed them down with water and went for lunch. At 3pm I turned up at radiography suite #9 (of 12) which was to be ‘my’ suite for the 37 consecutive sessions. There were to be five sessions per week with the weekend and bank-holiday off; those weekends were to become oases of recuperation and much needed rest for mind and body. I hadn’t realised it but the radiography treatment turned out to be a trial of major proportions which tested my equanimity to the utmost, not least because in addition to the vitamin B3 a full bladder is necessary and each session was preceded by the imbibing of 6 tumblers of water (later Ribena, a now much-hated blackcurrant cordial drink). After a few sessions I cannot describe what an effort there is in drinking that much water on cue and in double-quick time.

And so the summer proceeded. Every weekday at 1pm I would bathe and at 1.30pm I took my 12 vitamin B3 tablets and filled a Ribena bottle with its diluted sugar and blackcurrant essence. At 2pm I would jump into my car for the 20 minute drive to Northwood and Hertfordshire’s premier cancer treatment hospital. I would log-in my arrival on the computer terminal and by 2.30 I would be sitting in the waiting room to radiography suite #9 where my favourite technician Louise would appear and each day enquire as to when the vitamin tablets were taken and she would instruct me to commence drinking my litre or so of water/Ribena at an appropriate time.
The density of radiography customers changed almost daily; some days I seemed to be about the only one present yet on other days it was difficult to find a seat as the waiting room was full of people awaiting treatment with their friends and family. Mainly though, my fellow sufferers were men of a certain age – mostly older – and some of us became quite pally.

It takes all sorts of course; there were people from all walks of life and social standing – even one inveterate smoker who regularly nipped out for a fag – and these variables were accompanied by a range of attitude regarding the fairness of the incidence of cancer and the approach to the possibility of death. Most seemed resigned to their fate one way or another, but few did so with good grace.

There were some sad cases (of women particularly) who seemed close to the end and of the walking wounded who came into the waiting room wheeling their post-chemotherapy saline drip stands insistently bleeping. One case stands out, a mother of two in her mid-thirties being treated for cancer of the cervix that had metastasized; she had had a hysterectomy, was receiving regular chemotherapy and was also on a long round of radiotherapy. Fortunately she was always accompanied by two or three girl-friends who seemed to keep her spirits raised; inwardly, I wished her well with all my heart, outwardly we spoke about her family.

After every twelfth radiotherapy session I had an MRI scan, each of which lasted 90 minutes, just like the first: apparently they needed to duplicate the scans. I got to know the MRI technicians quite well and earned a reputation of being a cool customer. There was nothing that I could complain about: with a single exception, everybody I met or had dealings with at Mount Vernon Hospital was kind, considerate and clearly knew their shit. The hospital itself is a bit run-down in places particularly externally where most window frames badly need repainting, but it makes up for dowdiness with architectural inventiveness. There is one building on the campus which is one of the most interesting Art Nouveau inspired buildings that I have ever seen in the UK. All in all it is a shining example of the best the NHS has to offer. The restaurant is particularly good.

One of the research team, the lovely Juliette, sought me out most weeks to enquire as to progress and the day, day 15, I puked up the 12 vitamin B3 tablets brought the top man running and the dose was lowered and I was given anti-emetic pills to assist in the taking of the B3 for the remainder of the treatment. Equally, when I spoke about the increasing difficulty and painfulness of night urination I was immediately prescribed another capsule to help relax the pressure from the prostate on the urethra. All prescriptions were dispensed promptly at the hospital’s own pharmacy so there was no inconvenience to the patient at all. It was all very efficient and caring.

Even the car parking is good. Rare among hospitals I have visited there is an ample provision, always spaces at any time of day. And the cost is reasonable: outpatients can buy tokens for £1 a piece that will provide a full 24 hours’ parking. Would that all hospitals were as enlightened (Watford general is an expensive nightmare). So everything I encountered at Mount Vernon was carefully designed to ease and mitigate the stress and strain of carrying cancer.

Each time I visited the radiography suite I calculated the percentage completed and after three days I was 10% done. Reaching 25% seemed good but 50% was even better. And then there were newbies with whom I could commiserate and perhaps shed a little enlightenment. At 75% I again had trouble with those pesky vitamin B3 tablets – it was if my body just rejected them. I tried to deceive the body by using a pestle and mortar to crush the tablets and mix with sugar – failure. Even blending the mixture didn’t help so I had to grin and bear it. Titanic phlegmatism needed.

And then it was all over: 100% and an occasion to buy Louise and the radiography team gifts of appreciation and to commence recuperation. Juliette made an appointment for feed-back in two weeks hence and that was it. I had been warned at the outset of a feeling of fatigue and I expected a sort of languid limpness but it wasn’t like that: I would be trolling along quite happily when suddenly I would be overtaken by immense tiredness at almost any time of day (but particularly in the afternoons) and the only response was to crash out. It was like being pole-axed and I would sleep soundly for anything between four and eight hours.

Visiting the toilet was an anarchic affair through the radiography and now the time was right for some regulation. Slowly things have got better in that department but one of the problems with the hormone replacement therapy is that the old John Thomas, which was never big – adequate and fully operational but not big – seems to have shrunk. Mentally, I have to admit that my appreciation of the opposite gender is becoming ever more aesthetic in this post-treatment phase and there remains a further 30 months of HRT.

I had a second feed-back session with Juliette two weeks after the first and she rang me two days ago for the third having previously decided that we could complete her forms over the ‘phone. The questions are mainly related to urination and defecation. I asked about prognostication at our first post radiotherapy session but it turns out that a six month period of stabilization is necessary for the body not to provide ‘false positives’ and so as matters currently stand I have absolutely no idea if the cancer has been effectively neutralised by the treatments.

As well as recording my experiences with this disease whilst I remember my real intention in writing this post is to praise the UK’s National Health Service. The whole experience shows the NHS at its best and whilst the personal experience was not easy none of that can be laid at the door of the organisation or effectiveness of the NHS. It is said that there is a post-code lottery with health treatment in the UK and if that is true I obviously live in one of the lucky ones. Good old Hertfordshire.

And if you have been, thanks for reading.

Stephen Coulson @philositect on Twitter

It is the run-up to Christmas and when you live a life as relatively isolated and alone as many of us do one way of keeping connected to the thread and pulse of life is through film. We live vicariously through the drama of others’ lives, their emotions and expectations. Each year around this time I watch ‘Blade Runner’ (the final director’s cut), ‘L A Confidential’ and ‘The Usual Suspects’: real ‘comfort viewing’ for me. There are few films that I could watch time and again but these three pass that test.

In the UK there is a l-o-n-g-running radio programme called ‘Desert Island Discs’ in which a notable or celeb of some rank chooses the eight ‘gramophone’ records – you can tell from that term how long the show has been running – that they would take with them were they to be shipwrecked on a desert island. In between playing the records the host, currently the estimable Kirstie Young (she of one of the sexiest voices and THE sexiest laugh ever, with the possible exception of Charlotte Green) winkles out the guest’s biography.

If there was a TV equivalent to DID, let us call it ‘Desert Island Films’ (suggestions for better titles welcome) and were I ever to be invited to share my favourite eight films ‘Blade Runner’, ‘L A Confidential’ and ‘The Usual Suspects’ would have to be included. From ‘Blade Runner’ I would choose Roy’s soliloquy in which he lists some of what he has witnessed immediately before dying including the immortal lines ‘I’ve… seen things you people wouldn’t believe… attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate …’ Classic.

Normally, I just watch a film and then pretty much forget it, glad to have spent an hour or so in the imaginary world of espionage, crime, sci-fi, government conspiracy or romance. Personally I have never enjoyed horror films of any kind or films of the occult – I’m completely turned off by portrayals of Satan or the devil owing to a complete absence of belief in such an entity. Ditto God.

I’ve stopped going to the movies as I tend to fall asleep during the screening and anyway for the £10 entrance fee I can acquire a couple of DVDs from Asda or Sainsbury’s and watch them at my leisure. These days this means the early hours of the morning when the world is quiet and there is a wakeful opening between evening naps and morning slumber.

Men watch films often to see a favourite actress and last night I watched two hugely enjoyable films, the first was Joe Wright’s ‘Hanna’ and the second ‘Julie and Julia’ a film by Nora Ephron. It was this film that prompted me to blog a post about film. ‘Hanna’ stars Saoirse Ronan and Cate Blanchett, and ‘J&J’ Amy Adams and Meryl Streep. I was captivated by both Saoirse and Amy and each of these films give the lie to the oft heard and entirely erroneous complaint by women actors that there are all too few good roles for women in film.


Saoirse Ronan


Amy Adams

Amy was quite superb in ‘Julie and Julia’ bringing a delicious realism to the mannerisms, intentions and emotions of the blogger. What I really liked about the film was that each of the two female leads was portrayed having loving mature marriages with men who loved them and fully supported their passions, just as real men do. Men who fail to support their women are not real men; they’re wimps or self-obsessed narcissists. Real men adore their women; that doesn’t mean they don’t have to put up with a lot from these prima donnas, because they do, but the fact is men find needy women a turn-off whereas strong independently minded women are endlessly attractive and desirable. This is the reason why men of sound psychological ontology are de facto feminists; they realise that if they are to achieve any degree of personal self-actualisation then their women need to be free to fully develop their own light, for by that enlightenment men can be shown the next step in their own mental and emotional self-realisation.

Great films accurately reflect the drama that a beautiful woman creates by her mere existence. Women are probably more complex creatures than men and they seem to be forever hatching one plan or another, a characteristic often portrayed as being brought to stillness only by the love and adoration of the right man.

Now I wish to make it abundantly clear at this point that I am not in any way being critical of LGBT love – we all desire love and the company of the beloved – but for hetrosexual ‘cis’ men the love of a good woman is the apogee of human relationships. As a ‘cis’ male I am not qualified to speak for those of other mature and adult sexual inclinations; truly, I believe we should all live and let live and I wish each and everybody success in finding that special person who will give their life meaning and direction. But I digress.

Given that the programme ‘Desert Island Films’ doesn’t exist (yet) and even if it were I wouldn’t be selected to appear I present my possible and all oft-viewed eight films here:

‘Blade Runner’ – see above for chosen scene

‘L A Confidential’ – ‘Bud’ falls for Kim Basinger

‘The usual Suspects’ – ‘the greatest trick the devil ever did’

‘The Bourne Identity’ – evacuation plan

‘The Fifth Element’ – the soprano singing Lucia Di Lammermoor

‘2001’- The Blue Danube docking sequence

‘Pulp Fiction’ – Uma and Travolta’s dance sequence

‘Casablanca’ – the bar frail joining in the singing of ‘La Marseillaise’

Since writing the above I have watched ‘Cloud Atlas’ from the Wachowski stable, producers and directors of the Matrix trilogy. Apart from the film’s conviction of karma, which is a concept that I seriously doubt but do not completely dismiss, the film was quite brilliant. Andy and Lana Wachowski each shot half the film simultaneously, which produced scheduling headaches, but it was edited beautifully. The film breaches any categorization having a toe in romance, who-dunnit, comedy, swash-buckling and sci-fi and does so with a small company of stars each playing a plethora of karmic roles.

Once again women were given almost equal importance in the film and, although fewer in number their importance in the film was seminal; for me the inclusion of Bae Doona and Zhou Xun was a double revelation. Reviewers have had difficulty in pinning the film down but it seemed to me to be an entertaining essay on two ideas: the first is a line from Khalil Gibran’s ‘The Prophet’ on marriage, “You were born together …” here it is in context:

“You were born together, and together you shall be forevermore.
You shall be together when the white wings of death scatter your days.
Aye, you shall be together even in the silent memory of God.
But let there be spaces in your togetherness,
And let the winds of the heavens dance between you.
Love one another but make not a bond of love:
Let it rather be a moving sea between the shores of your souls.
Fill each other’s cup but drink not from one cup.
Give one another of your bread but eat not from the same loaf.
Sing and dance together and be joyous, but let each one of you be alone,
Even as the strings of a lute are alone though they quiver with the same music.
Give your hearts, but not into each other’s keeping.
For only the hand of Life can contain your hearts.
And stand together, yet not too near together:
For the pillars of the temple stand apart,
And the oak tree and the cypress grow not in each other’s shadow.”

The seeds of karma are contained in the first line. Karma is a Vedic concept now deeply embedded into Hinduism which involves ‘samsara’ or the mechanical wheel of rebirth. The belief says it is only possible to escape the karma of rebirth by full self-realization of the unity of the self thereby joining in the eternal reality of the one universal Self. So the film portrays the same non-realized ‘person’ – even to having the same birthmark in different incarnations – having many embodiments over a three-hundred year timeframe, but tied in to other people experiencing similar karmic journeys together.

There is one other idea that suggested itself contained in the famous poem ‘Ozymandias’ by Percy Bysshe Shelley which speaks of human hubris:

I met a traveller from an antique land
Who said: “Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. Near them on the sand,
Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown
And wrinkled lip and sneer of cold command
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed.
And on the pedestal these words appear:
`My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings:
Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!’
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare,
The lone and level sands stretch far away”.

Anyway, I enjoyed the film greatly and will have to view it a few more times, just as I did the original ‘Matrix’ which of course explores the idea that what we take as reality is in fact just an illusion – maybe even a gigantic computer programme. Another idea borrowed from Vedic thought.

That’s it for now, and if you have been thanks for reading. And thank goodness for the art of film. Especially in the depths of winter.